X-Git-Url: http://git.rot13.org/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=net%2Fcore%2Fsock.c;h=51fcfbc041a73d38f0172a77c1e5e48b1224f0b7;hb=ad73c67e792c752ddc99f2b0587abae05255dd6d;hp=533b9317144ba82d46a8243aa5df93a5cc29f913;hpb=6ab3d5624e172c553004ecc862bfeac16d9d68b7;p=powerpc.git diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 533b931714..51fcfbc041 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -129,6 +129,53 @@ #include #endif +/* + * Each address family might have different locking rules, so we have + * one slock key per address family: + */ +static struct lock_class_key af_family_keys[AF_MAX]; +static struct lock_class_key af_family_slock_keys[AF_MAX]; + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC +/* + * Make lock validator output more readable. (we pre-construct these + * strings build-time, so that runtime initialization of socket + * locks is fast): + */ +static const char *af_family_key_strings[AF_MAX+1] = { + "sk_lock-AF_UNSPEC", "sk_lock-AF_UNIX" , "sk_lock-AF_INET" , + "sk_lock-AF_AX25" , "sk_lock-AF_IPX" , "sk_lock-AF_APPLETALK", + "sk_lock-AF_NETROM", "sk_lock-AF_BRIDGE" , "sk_lock-AF_ATMPVC" , + "sk_lock-AF_X25" , "sk_lock-AF_INET6" , "sk_lock-AF_ROSE" , + "sk_lock-AF_DECnet", "sk_lock-AF_NETBEUI" , "sk_lock-AF_SECURITY" , + "sk_lock-AF_KEY" , "sk_lock-AF_NETLINK" , "sk_lock-AF_PACKET" , + "sk_lock-AF_ASH" , "sk_lock-AF_ECONET" , "sk_lock-AF_ATMSVC" , + "sk_lock-21" , "sk_lock-AF_SNA" , "sk_lock-AF_IRDA" , + "sk_lock-AF_PPPOX" , "sk_lock-AF_WANPIPE" , "sk_lock-AF_LLC" , + "sk_lock-27" , "sk_lock-28" , "sk_lock-29" , + "sk_lock-AF_TIPC" , "sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH", "sk_lock-AF_MAX" +}; +static const char *af_family_slock_key_strings[AF_MAX+1] = { + "slock-AF_UNSPEC", "slock-AF_UNIX" , "slock-AF_INET" , + "slock-AF_AX25" , "slock-AF_IPX" , "slock-AF_APPLETALK", + "slock-AF_NETROM", "slock-AF_BRIDGE" , "slock-AF_ATMPVC" , + "slock-AF_X25" , "slock-AF_INET6" , "slock-AF_ROSE" , + "slock-AF_DECnet", "slock-AF_NETBEUI" , "slock-AF_SECURITY" , + "slock-AF_KEY" , "slock-AF_NETLINK" , "slock-AF_PACKET" , + "slock-AF_ASH" , "slock-AF_ECONET" , "slock-AF_ATMSVC" , + "slock-21" , "slock-AF_SNA" , "slock-AF_IRDA" , + "slock-AF_PPPOX" , "slock-AF_WANPIPE" , "slock-AF_LLC" , + "slock-27" , "slock-28" , "slock-29" , + "slock-AF_TIPC" , "slock-AF_BLUETOOTH", "slock-AF_MAX" +}; +#endif + +/* + * sk_callback_lock locking rules are per-address-family, + * so split the lock classes by using a per-AF key: + */ +static struct lock_class_key af_callback_keys[AF_MAX]; + /* Take into consideration the size of the struct sk_buff overhead in the * determination of these values, since that is non-constant across * platforms. This makes socket queueing behavior and performance @@ -237,9 +284,16 @@ int sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) skb->dev = NULL; bh_lock_sock(sk); - if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) + if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) { + /* + * trylock + unlock semantics: + */ + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_); + rc = sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb); - else + + mutex_release(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_); + } else sk_add_backlog(sk, skb); bh_unlock_sock(sk); out: @@ -749,6 +803,33 @@ lenout: return 0; } +/* + * Initialize an sk_lock. + * + * (We also register the sk_lock with the lock validator.) + */ +static void inline sock_lock_init(struct sock *sk) +{ + spin_lock_init(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + sk->sk_lock.owner = NULL; + init_waitqueue_head(&sk->sk_lock.wq); + /* + * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held lock: + */ + debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)&sk->sk_lock, sizeof(sk->sk_lock)); + + /* + * Mark both the sk_lock and the sk_lock.slock as a + * per-address-family lock class: + */ + lockdep_set_class_and_name(&sk->sk_lock.slock, + af_family_slock_keys + sk->sk_family, + af_family_slock_key_strings[sk->sk_family]); + lockdep_init_map(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, + af_family_key_strings[sk->sk_family], + af_family_keys + sk->sk_family); +} + /** * sk_alloc - All socket objects are allocated here * @family: protocol family @@ -848,6 +929,8 @@ struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority) rwlock_init(&newsk->sk_dst_lock); rwlock_init(&newsk->sk_callback_lock); + lockdep_set_class(&newsk->sk_callback_lock, + af_callback_keys + newsk->sk_family); newsk->sk_dst_cache = NULL; newsk->sk_wmem_queued = 0; @@ -1422,6 +1505,8 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk) rwlock_init(&sk->sk_dst_lock); rwlock_init(&sk->sk_callback_lock); + lockdep_set_class(&sk->sk_callback_lock, + af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family); sk->sk_state_change = sock_def_wakeup; sk->sk_data_ready = sock_def_readable; @@ -1449,24 +1534,34 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk) void fastcall lock_sock(struct sock *sk) { might_sleep(); - spin_lock_bh(&(sk->sk_lock.slock)); + spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); if (sk->sk_lock.owner) __lock_sock(sk); sk->sk_lock.owner = (void *)1; - spin_unlock_bh(&(sk->sk_lock.slock)); + spin_unlock(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + /* + * The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here: + */ + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); + local_bh_enable(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock); void fastcall release_sock(struct sock *sk) { - spin_lock_bh(&(sk->sk_lock.slock)); + /* + * The sk_lock has mutex_unlock() semantics: + */ + mutex_release(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_); + + spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); if (sk->sk_backlog.tail) __release_sock(sk); sk->sk_lock.owner = NULL; - if (waitqueue_active(&(sk->sk_lock.wq))) - wake_up(&(sk->sk_lock.wq)); - spin_unlock_bh(&(sk->sk_lock.slock)); + if (waitqueue_active(&sk->sk_lock.wq)) + wake_up(&sk->sk_lock.wq); + spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);