From 011b2a36278cca110c70506ad85b042c2faabac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Dooks Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:27:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [MTD] Fixup probing logic for single 16bit devices The change to the generic probe to look for the smallest width of chip first is causing some problems on boards with a single 16bit device. The problem seems to be the jedec_match() is truncating the device-id read from the table to match against the one read from the hardware, causing a match against the partial id of some chips with 16bit IDs (such as the SST39LF160) This fixes things for my own board, but something may need to be done if the same problem is exhibited for chips with an 8bit ID Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c index 30325a25ab..c2ef821b7a 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* Common Flash Interface probe code. (C) 2000 Red Hat. GPL'd. - $Id: jedec_probe.c,v 1.61 2004/11/19 20:52:16 thayne Exp $ + $Id: jedec_probe.c,v 1.62 2005/02/14 16:27:34 bjd Exp $ See JEDEC (http://www.jedec.org/) standard JESD21C (section 3.5) for the standard this probe goes back to. @@ -1856,6 +1856,16 @@ static inline int jedec_match( __u32 base, case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X8: mfr = (__u8)finfo->mfr_id; id = (__u8)finfo->dev_id; + + /* bjd: it seems that if we do this, we can end up + * detecting 16bit flashes as an 8bit device, even though + * there aren't. + */ + if (finfo->dev_id > 0xff) { + DEBUG( MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL3, "%s(): ID is not 8bit\n", + __func__); + goto match_done; + } break; case CFI_DEVICETYPE_X16: mfr = (__u16)finfo->mfr_id; -- 2.20.1