From 319c2a986eb45989690c955d9667b814ef0ed56f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:34:06 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: fix freezeable workqueues implementation Currently ->freezeable is per-cpu, this is wrong. CPU_UP_PREPARE creates cwq->thread which is not freezeable. Move ->freezeable to workqueue_struct. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: Gautham shenoy Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/workqueue.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 5ecf4984e3..d80dbdcead 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -49,8 +49,6 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct { struct work_struct *current_work; int run_depth; /* Detect run_workqueue() recursion depth */ - - int freezeable; /* Freeze the thread during suspend */ } ____cacheline_aligned; /* @@ -61,6 +59,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct { struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cpu_wq; const char *name; struct list_head list; /* Empty if single thread */ + int freezeable; /* Freeze threads during suspend */ }; /* All the per-cpu workqueues on the system, for hotplug cpu to add/remove @@ -351,7 +350,7 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq) struct k_sigaction sa; sigset_t blocked; - if (!cwq->freezeable) + if (!cwq->wq->freezeable) current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE; set_user_nice(current, -5); @@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq) set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); while (!kthread_should_stop()) { - if (cwq->freezeable) + if (cwq->wq->freezeable) try_to_freeze(); add_wait_queue(&cwq->more_work, &wait); @@ -546,7 +545,7 @@ out: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_work); static struct task_struct *create_workqueue_thread(struct workqueue_struct *wq, - int cpu, int freezeable) + int cpu) { struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu); struct task_struct *p; @@ -554,7 +553,6 @@ static struct task_struct *create_workqueue_thread(struct workqueue_struct *wq, spin_lock_init(&cwq->lock); cwq->wq = wq; cwq->thread = NULL; - cwq->freezeable = freezeable; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cwq->worklist); init_waitqueue_head(&cwq->more_work); @@ -586,10 +584,12 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__create_workqueue(const char *name, } wq->name = name; + wq->freezeable = freezeable; + mutex_lock(&workqueue_mutex); if (singlethread) { INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wq->list); - p = create_workqueue_thread(wq, singlethread_cpu, freezeable); + p = create_workqueue_thread(wq, singlethread_cpu); if (!p) destroy = 1; else @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__create_workqueue(const char *name, } else { list_add(&wq->list, &workqueues); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { - p = create_workqueue_thread(wq, cpu, freezeable); + p = create_workqueue_thread(wq, cpu); if (p) { kthread_bind(p, cpu); wake_up_process(p); @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, mutex_lock(&workqueue_mutex); /* Create a new workqueue thread for it. */ list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { - if (!create_workqueue_thread(wq, hotcpu, 0)) { + if (!create_workqueue_thread(wq, hotcpu)) { printk("workqueue for %i failed\n", hotcpu); return NOTIFY_BAD; } -- 2.20.1