From f5921697cf5cae68dcbfa881d9e08f3cebef47eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Ellerman Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:23:26 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Compare irq numbers with NO_IRQ not IRQ_NONE There is a thinko in the irq code, it uses IRQ_NONE to indicate no irq, whereas it should be using NO_IRQ. IRQ_NONE is returned from irq handlers to say "not handled". As it happens they currently have the same value (0), so this is just for future proof-ness. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras --- arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c index 068377a2a8..42c8ed6ed5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ struct irq_host *irq_alloc_host(unsigned int revmap_type, case IRQ_HOST_MAP_LINEAR: rmap = (unsigned int *)(host + 1); for (i = 0; i < revmap_arg; i++) - rmap[i] = IRQ_NONE; + rmap[i] = NO_IRQ; host->revmap_data.linear.size = revmap_arg; smp_wmb(); host->revmap_data.linear.revmap = rmap; @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ unsigned int irq_create_mapping(struct irq_host *host, * host->ops->map() to update the flags */ virq = irq_find_mapping(host, hwirq); - if (virq != IRQ_NONE) { + if (virq != NO_IRQ) { if (host->ops->remap) host->ops->remap(host, virq, hwirq); pr_debug("irq: -> existing mapping on virq %d\n", virq); @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq) switch(host->revmap_type) { case IRQ_HOST_MAP_LINEAR: if (hwirq < host->revmap_data.linear.size) - host->revmap_data.linear.revmap[hwirq] = IRQ_NONE; + host->revmap_data.linear.revmap[hwirq] = NO_IRQ; break; case IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE: /* Check if radix tree allocated yet */ -- 2.20.1