frequency error is actually twice of what we thought.
authorHarald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:32:07 +0000 (19:32 +0100)
committerHarald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:32:07 +0000 (19:32 +0100)
commit2df0b01363992deecf35cd8aee7cd5fec9aae7c6
tree2f3d95b217ecef21883c9216235490362f632367
parent18ab2998bb1c90829d485487190f8151088300c3
frequency error is actually twice of what we thought.

The cause is really not clear.  The formual using 2*Pi to convert
from radians to frequency is perfectly correct.

However, measurements with various test equipment (including Racal 6103)
have shown our frequency error estimate is always off by a power of two...
src/target/firmware/layer1/afc.c
src/target/firmware/layer1/sync.c