[POWERPC] Compare irq numbers with NO_IRQ not IRQ_NONE
authorMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:23:26 +0000 (17:23 +1000)
committerPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Sat, 2 Jun 2007 11:01:56 +0000 (21:01 +1000)
There is a thinko in the irq code, it uses IRQ_NONE to indicate no irq,
whereas it should be using NO_IRQ.  IRQ_NONE is returned from irq
handlers to say "not handled".

As it happens they currently have the same value (0), so this is just for
future proof-ness.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c

index 068377a..42c8ed6 100644 (file)
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ struct irq_host *irq_alloc_host(unsigned int revmap_type,
        case IRQ_HOST_MAP_LINEAR:
                rmap = (unsigned int *)(host + 1);
                for (i = 0; i < revmap_arg; i++)
-                       rmap[i] = IRQ_NONE;
+                       rmap[i] = NO_IRQ;
                host->revmap_data.linear.size = revmap_arg;
                smp_wmb();
                host->revmap_data.linear.revmap = rmap;
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ unsigned int irq_create_mapping(struct irq_host *host,
         * host->ops->map() to update the flags
         */
        virq = irq_find_mapping(host, hwirq);
-       if (virq != IRQ_NONE) {
+       if (virq != NO_IRQ) {
                if (host->ops->remap)
                        host->ops->remap(host, virq, hwirq);
                pr_debug("irq: -> existing mapping on virq %d\n", virq);
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
        switch(host->revmap_type) {
        case IRQ_HOST_MAP_LINEAR:
                if (hwirq < host->revmap_data.linear.size)
-                       host->revmap_data.linear.revmap[hwirq] = IRQ_NONE;
+                       host->revmap_data.linear.revmap[hwirq] = NO_IRQ;
                break;
        case IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE:
                /* Check if radix tree allocated yet */